Jan Peter Apel

janpeterapel@t-online.de

The Truths of the World
or
The Look into the Future

As of August 12, 2025

The first person who can verifiably refute the following new world theory in its essential parts
will receive a reward of ten thousend Euro from me, but only during my lifetime.
As a preface, the current state of the level of knowledge

Since Newton, finding unequivocal truths about the origins of natural phenomena in this world has not been possible, neither by pure physicists nor by "theoretical physics" physicists. Therefore, the requirements for the correctness of new theories were first reduced to only free of physical contradictions, and later, for theoretical physics, even to only free of mathematical contradictions. However, both only free of contradictions criteria represent a capitulation to the possibility of finding truths in nature.
As a result of these consistency criteria, endless fantasies arose for celestial mechanics, just as they did at the beginning of thinking humanity, which also observed the sky and crafted explanations using gods.

The only truths of celestial mechanics that were discovered after Newton, but not recognized, are Einstein's postulate that our weight arises from an acceleration from bottom to top, which is easy to measure for anyone, but whose consequences Einstein himself ignored, as well as the discovery of the existence of the so-called time dilation, which is also measurable, but unfortunately does not cause any directly visible phenomena.

In contrast to explanations of small things like quanta, atoms, and molecules (chemistry, biology), which we observe with an external perspective and thus obtain undisputed truths, celestial mechanics can only be viewed from within, without an external perspective. The result: from Einstein's relative, and thus false, perspective, the former gods were replaced by a maze of physically speculative interpretations, based on extrapolations from extrapolations(!), especially the incomprehensible concepts of space curvature, spacetime, dark matter, and dark energy, all of which are still completely unproven and are decisively refuted below.

Nature follows in particular its highest and most important law:
Truths of nature can be found only
in its naturally coordinate systems.

For celestial mechanics, it is only that one
which is tied to the absolute zero point of the cosmos.
Without this, all theories about the cosmos are false.
Einstein did not find this zero point;
he postulated his "personal zero point," his force-free body:
relative to this, he described the world.

Mathematical formulas can never express the laws of nature: laws are verbal! "You can see it in that way too" is absolutely forbidden in physics as an explanation of nature! There is no freedom to choose a coordinate system that suits you; on the contrary: "You can see it in that way too" is a guarantee for getting completely lost in nature. It's up to you to discover how nature sees itself! Einstein relied on an unnatural, and therefore incorrect, coordinate system.
Physics is not about describing nature, but about explaining it,
which must also be the definition of physics!
Explanations consist of causes, effects, and effective principles.
Explanations must be absolute truths.


Content

Introduction
1 What causes time dilation?
2 What is time?
3 When does time dilation occur?
4 What is time dilation?
5 The relativistic factor gamma
6 What are inertial systems?
7 Newly added on October 10, 2024:
Where does time dilation occur
and where does it not occur?
8 Einstein's Mistake
 9 The Nonsense of Special Relativity
10 General Relativity
11 A New Way of Thinking with Natural Sense
12 Gravity
13 Dark Matter and Dark Energy
14 Black Holes
Afterword
Two experiments that prove the existence of the ether


Introduction

Physics was created to understand the world. To this day, however, it is still not a science, because science has to determine what is true and what is false. And that is precisely what modern physics still cannot do. In physics publications, for example, it is forbidden to say right and wrong, or even true and false.
When Einstein came along, physics was still in order: Newton's discovered laws explained (almost) everything. Einstein was advised not to study physics, because nothing new could come from it. Einstein first created a better way to handle time dilation, which was unknown to Newtonian physics and already known as the slowing down of time in moving objects. But he could not explain it. This time dilation is easily measurable and therefore very real, and also affects Newtonian physics, as follows.

Einstein (not alone!) created the special theory of relativity with time dilation, which, as we will see later, is nonsense, which is why it also cannot explain the measurement results of the Hafele-Keating experiment. Today, people are still just fiddling around with time dilation without knowing why it even exists. As we will see later, it is a purely mechanical process, just as even the quantum world is classified as mechanical. Einstein later developed his general theory of relativity (GR). What is it?

Einstein wanted to use it to shed light on the gravitational phenomena that baffled humanity. He was fascinated by the question of what could be inferred from the trajectory of a force-free body that describes a parabolic trajectory on Earth. To this end, he assumed that the ballistically curved trajectory of the body's parabolic trajectory must actually be straight and constant in velocity according to Newton's law of inertia. And this is true! In space, this would also be observed. On Earth, however, this trajectory is curved in the familiar way as a parabolic trajectory.
Our location here is, of course, not the one that could be said to be the zero point of the universe. This zero point would have to be the one from which one could observe what is and isn't actually moving in the cosmos. All observations not viewed from this absolute zero point are therefore relative, that is, false!

Relative to absolute zero, we on the Earth's surface actually have a velocity of motion, which is proven by our existing time dilation (known as "gravitational" time dilation). Additionally, we even have a permanent acceleration, which, as Einstein correctly stated, causes our weight. Our imperceptible velocity is 11.2 km/s. This is the escape velocity from the Earth, with which we could escape upwards. The origin of our invisible velocity and acceleration from below to above will be explained later. Both our motion and acceleration, despite our position at rest relative to the Earth's surface, are visually invisible: This is the great mystery to be solved!

Einstein then further reasoned: If this curved ballistic trajectory of the force-free body is actually straight and constant in speed, then the view from this perspective must also reveal the true picture of the world. So he calculated what the picture of the world looks like from the perspective of this body. Since this view is one from a position of motion, it is a relative one, hence the theory of relativity, even though it is supposed to be a theory of gravity. So far, so good, right?

Relatively, when a car crashes into a tree, we see the tree approaching us. Is the tree actually moving? Of course not; it only appears that way from the car's perspective. If the tree were hit while cornering, the tree would appear to be moving sideways before.
Einstein calculated the stellar space from the perspective of a moving object, namely a freely falling body. But since the body is moving, when viewed from the body's perspective, the body's movements relative to the still unknown absolute point of the world are transferred to the surroundings, just as the car's movement previously became the apparent movement of its surroundings, including the tree.

The straight bending of the free-falling body's curve then mathematically led to the apparent bending of the entire environment (spatial curvature), and the constant velocity led to the apparent variation of time (spacetime). But: Just as the tree doesn't move when a car crashes, space and time around a freely falling body don't change either; it only appears that way from the perspective!

However, thinking in terms of straight lines and constant speed is still no definition of how absolute, i.e., how true, movements are. The question still remains: relative to what does a body actually move? So, where is the absolute zero point for movements in the universe? It's certainly not on the surface of the Earth. Whether and how fast a body moves absolutely is determined by its time dilation: this is an incorruptible and extremely precise absolute criterion for the speed of movement of a body relative to absolute zero, regardless of who or what this zero point is!

Einstein's view of the "straightened" fall of a body, which describes the gravitational world from the atom upwards in its trajectories, is merely a theory of gravity. But with the additional assumption that light possesses a simultaneous absolute and relative constancy of speed, it became a (so far imperfect) theory of the universe. However, no rational human being can ever understand such a thing materially. Consolation: It cannot be understood at all, because it is false. A theory that cannot be understood is fundamentally false, for the very purpose of a theory is to make something understandable! And mathematical formulations per se can never describe anything understandable.

General relativity, like special relativity, is physical nonsense, which will be proven in detail below and replaced by a presentation from the correct perspective, namely, from the discovered absolute reference point of the world. Nevertheless, as will be explained later, the mathematics of general relativity produces useful results, which is not an exception in physics, where various physically incorrect theories—for example, including general relativity, even five entirely different theories of gravity—nevertheless produce mathematically equally correct results. And this proves beyond doubt:
Mathematics can't prove
anything in physics, ever!

Einstein's general theory of relativity yields some correct results, such as the deflection of meteorite trajectories by the moon, Earth, or sun. However, this never allows us to determine the causes of such deviations, as they are merely symptoms, but of what? Why does the apple fall from the tree? The trajectory it takes (in this case, a vertical straight line) is a symptom, not an explanation.

Isn't it surprising that Einstein didn't receive the Nobel Prize for his general theory of relativity? Nevertheless, it became the basis of all mechanical science today! The Nobel Prize Committee can only be congratulated for this: it recognized that pure calculations without physical substance are not physics. Einstein received the Nobel Prize for the postulation of the photon of light only as consolation.

Mathematics is no longer involved in the following; nature itself knows what it does, how, and why.

Einstein's general theory of relativity, which describes the gravitational motions of the universe from the atom upwards, is not a physical theory, but merely a mathematical description of the motions of bodies in free space relative to a force-free falling body. It is a theory of gravity with the two additional assumptions that, despite its parabolic trajectory, the force-free body moves in a straight line and at a constant speed according to Newton's law of inertia, and that light possesses both absolute and relative constancy of speed, which also makes the universe super-dimensional. Both additional assumptions are demonstrably refuted below.
Newtonian physics became a mere appendage in Einstein's concoction. No one can understand Einstein's colossal universe, not even the "greatest" physicists, because humans cannot understand colossal things. The only proven truth that remains is Newtonian physics, with its so-called time dilation, which is demonstrably a slowing down of time. However, this slowing down of time is not a supernatural or colossal "thing"; rather, as a sketch clearly illustrates, it can be explained as a normally understandable mechanical process, even within Newtonian physics!

The stars we see in the sky are real, but their exact positions aren't exactly where we see them! It depends on how often or how closely their light has been deflected by other stars or galaxies along the way. However, there is no further deflection according to Einstein's curvature of space.

It will become clear that our view of gravitationally induced processes at the Earth's surface is actually a relative one, and therefore incorrect, since we have a speed of movement and even a permanent acceleration relative to the zero point of the world, which is why we have not been able to find the zero point of movement of the world since time immemorial.
Einstein's mathematics correctly describes the world from the fictitious perspective of a theoretically straightened falling curve. Therefore, while the calculations for this relative view are correct, they do not lead to the true material realities that exist from the correct perspective of absolute zero.
The consequence: physical interpretations from Einstein's relative perspective are inevitably wrong, since they arise from the perspective of movement, which made the term "theory of relativity," which Einstein disliked, apt. This "relative nature," with its oversized fantasies such as the curvature of space, spacetime, and even parallel universes, thankfully does not exist in reality, and thus, to date, none of it has ever been concretely proven.
It applies without a doubt:
Even in physics, relative always means false,
only absolute means true.
relation is inherently false!

Einstein's general theory of relativity, which describes the gravitational motions of the universe from the atom upwards, is not a physical theory, but merely a mathematical description of the motions of bodies in free space relative to a force-free falling body. It is a theory of gravity with the two additional assumptions that, despite its parabolic trajectory, the force-free body moves in a straight line and at a constant speed according to Newton's law of inertia, and that light possesses both absolute and relative constancy of speed, which also makes the universe super-dimensional. Both additional assumptions are demonstrably refuted below.
Newtonian physics became a mere appendage in Einstein's concoction. No one can understand Einstein's colossal universe, not even the "greatest" physicists, because humans cannot understand colossal things. The only proven truth that remains is Newtonian physics, with its so-called time dilation, which is demonstrably a slowing down of time. However, this slowing down of time is not a supernatural or colossal "thing"; rather, as a sketch clearly illustrates, it can be explained as a normally understandable mechanical process, even within Newtonian physics!

When are theories true? Only when they fit together. The physics of the large (general relativity) doesn't fit with that of the small (quantum mechanics), so at least one of the two must be wrong: And that is Einstein's physics of the large.
This also follows from a supreme physical law: "Large consists of small." This is self-evident, but because of its triviality, it is inexpressible for scientists, even though it fundamentally determines nature. Large is always the many small, meaning that large and small cannot have different theories.
Today's mathematical thinking in so-called theoretical physics is truly theoretical and can only lead to false views of nature, which is what happened and led to the end of the exploration of nature; it is stuck. In the German weekly Newspaper DIE ZEIT No. 5, 2006, the feature series on physics was discontinued with the following article headline: "Over! Physics is in crisis!" The essence of the article: as a last resort, perhaps someone would have to come up with something completely crazy for a new perspective on the world so that things can move forward again. Here's "the crazy thing," and it comes with a research guideline for the future:
Think, don’t calculate!

If physics is at a dead end, which has undoubtedly been the case for decades, there is only one way out: go back and search for where and how one went astray. Going back means questioning all new theories that follow Newton's, especially Einstein's, which is the subject of this publication. Any physicist who dared to do so today would be expelled; it would be a taboo violation. Is research allowed to contain taboos? What are we afraid of?

In the following, Einstein's theories are exposed as false, which is why they cannot be understood but only believed. For example, Einstein's thesis that the speed of light is simultaneously absolute and relatively constant, which is a factual contradiction, can only be believed. There's no evidence for it, but there's evidence against it: If a radar beam, which is light, hits a car at only its speed, even though the car is coming the other way, the radar measurement of the car's speed wouldn't work at all, because the Doppler effect arises precisely because the speed of the light hitting the car increases by the speed of the oncoming car. Doubters of this truth are pacified by labeling the Newtonian Doppler effect, which Einstein says couldn't possibly exist, as a "relativistic Doppler effect," so that virtually no one can argue with it. That's how you hide unpleasant truths!

Physical laws are exclusively verbal statements about relationships in nature, never quantitative formulations as formulas that can only describe the symptoms of nature, its phenomena. What is sought, however, are the origins of phenomena, which is what physics must define.
A second criterion for the correctness of a physical theory is: If it cannot answer even a single question within its scope in a verbally understandable one-sentence manner, it is completely wrong. This is especially true if it leads to more new questions than existed when it was discovered. The resulting new and only correct world theory answers all questions, even those that were not yet known. Today's apparent theoretical advances lead to broader understanding: for every new theory, several new questions arise: research is moving in the wrong direction! Correct new insights, on the other hand, lead to the answers of several existing questions and thus to a consolidation of knowledge.

What does Newtonian physics look like in conjunction with time dilation? The shocking result as a true theory of the world, for which all the evidence is listed below as experimental results, which were either not properly evaluated or were adapted to false theories, such as the Hafele-Kaeting experiment, which definitively proves the special theory of relativity to be false and, with purely argumentative, i.e., fact-free lies, is even used to confirm it (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/1

 1 What causes time dilation?
Time dilation slows down Newtonian physics as a whole!
That's the short, simple, and true theory for everything that happens in this world.

Now the surprise: All formulas of Newtonian physics for natural processes in areas subject to time dilation continue to apply unchanged, with the slower passage of time, which also slows down the clocks in these areas. Observers from locations without or with a different time dilation must adjust the running of their clocks to that of the clocks in the observed areas in order to understand what is really happening there and how. The conversion to the local time flow is done using the so-called relativistic factor γ (gamma), which will be discussed in more detail below. Looking into or out of natural processes subject to time dilation is the so-called relativistic view, which is added to the absolute and relative view. This results in the following situation for explaining the world:
There is no other or additional physics to Newtonian physics.
Newtonian physics is the only one in this world and thus the world theory.
Newtonian physics with its time dilation
is the entire mystery of the universe,
which is only three-dimensional and understandable to anyone
with an interest in it.

The world is exactly as it appears
and there is nothing in it
with more dimensions than three!


To understand nature, no mathematics is required, only the "natural reason" coined by Arthur Schopenhauer. Anyone with sufficient interest can use this to understand the world. And even without it, but with confidence in what can be proven and a strict rejection of what cannot. Today's mathematically oversized "Einsteinian physics" has not yet been proven by a single thing that can be explained by material means! Mathematics is neither a "supervisor" for physics, nor can it serve as a substitute for proof, and certainly not as an unknown physical entity, that is, something that cannot yet be recognized and explained by material means. Richard Feynman (Nobel Prize 1965), the last known factual (not theoretical!) physicist, stated in "On the Nature of Physical Laws": "...that physics ultimately does not need mathematics." This "ultimate" is achieved in this publication.

"Understanding" nature is not mathematically possible, but exclusively verbally. Therefore, the "language of physics" is the normal, colloquial language that has evolved from the physical world without any specialized technical terms.

The definition of physics is to explain nature's
processes of motion verbally, from cause to effect,
using functional principles, in an understandable way,
not to calculate them; that is technical.
For every individual natural phenomenon,
there must be a short verbal explanation in one sentence
with its fundamental principle of origin, without technical terms,
since the basic principles of nature are of incomprehensible simplicity.

You can calculate natural phenomena even without knowing why they are the way they are. Physics has the task of finding out why natural processes occur. One example is the question of why an airplane can fly. Historically, relative perspectives have resulted in a thicket of many detailed theories that is unteachable in elementary schools and has led to the statement that flying is a complex process. The fact that in nature there is always a single basic functional principle for every individual event (principle of causality) is an unpopular requirement of nature for its researchers, even though discovering these basic principles is the main task of all research. The basic principle of flight is: an airplane can fly because it pushes air downwards with its rapidly moving wing surfaces, which are slightly angled forward and upward, in both normal and inverted flight. In short: an airplane stays up because it pushes air downwards, a result of Newton's law of force. Only with this fundamental principle can all the phenomena occurring around an aircraft, especially air vortices, be explained directly and rigorously. The natural coordinate system for flight is the surrounding air. An aircraft must do something in relation to and with this air to stay aloft. At a higher level, "staying aloft" between heaven and earth is generally only possible if mass is constantly repelled downwards to provide downward support. Rockets eject mass from their bellies, while airplanes take air to accelerate downwards

Now the fundamentals that lead to and prove this proposed theory of the world. Mathematics is not involved; it understands nothing about physics, and nature doesn't adhere to it either, although today's theoretical physics demands precisely that. For the speeds existing in the environment, which are very small compared to the speed of light, time dilation, i.e., the slowing down of time, is only smaller by many zeros after the decimal point, so that in everyday life, relativity does not become apparent due to time dilation. In particle accelerators, however, the factor for the slowing down of time in the fastest particles is almost zero.


2 What is time?
If we don't know what time is, time dilation can't be defined either. So far, science only knows that it exists and that it can be calculated. But calculations can always be made with anything that is measurable and reproducible, without knowing how this measurable and reproducible thing even arises. Time dilation is still just as unknown in science and teaching as gravity.

In physics (not in philosophy!), time is change. If nothing changes, there is no time. In physics, time is the term for the physical quantity necessary to quantify the progression of changes in state, location, or motion in nature. The definition of time is therefore also linked to a "something" that can also change, for in a nothing without something within it, there can be no time. Therefore, it can also be said that time is material: without a "thing," there is no time. Unfortunately, the passage of time is not a constant of nature; rather, it can run from a fastest value to a slower value, even to zero.

The Earth's rotation relative to the sun serves as a large-scale measure of the passage of time. However, this doesn't demonstrate what time dilation is, because that can never change. Within masses, its atoms, processes occur at different speeds, depending on the velocities of these massive bodies. The extent to which these velocities must be present will be explained below.
On a smaller scale, time is defined differently, namely by defining a unit of time as the duration an electron needs to orbit its atomic nucleus. Of course, the orbital period of an electron cannot be measured, not least because electrons move around the nucleus in a wave state. Nevertheless, the knowledge that the nucleus of an atom is orbited by something leads to truthful results. The first is that time also passes in matter; matter is alive! And it is even the case that this time, which, as will become clear, determines Newtonian physics, only exists in matter:
Feedback

There is no time in a room!

If there are no small movements in matter, there can be no movements of large bodies of matter either. Time has an effect on a small scale, for example, in chemistry, where processes take time. Fortunately, time in matter is even visible when atoms, e.g., in light-emitting diodes, emit light. When these atoms are subject to time dilation, their light, which is generated by electrons falling from higher to lower orbits, becomes longer-wavelength, and therefore redder. Why? Because the fall of the electrons also takes longer. And the redder process can be measured precisely. When measuring from and to moving bodies, the Doppler effect must, of course, be eliminated.

3 When does time dilation occur?
Now, according to the theory, time dilation in matter only occurs when a body is moving. But when does a body move? This brings us to "the" birth problem of physics: where is the zero point for everything? Einstein didn't find it. His "thinking" point for speeds of motion is an ominous, simultaneous, absolutely and relatively constant speed of light, which also made the world super-dimensional. So he didn't relate speeds to a zero point, but to a maximum possible one—what nonsense. The only sensible thing the theory says about the origin of time dilation is that a body must have previously acquired motion, i.e., speed, through acceleration. But even then, the question remains: relative to whom or what? An absolute zero point for motion, i.e., relative to whom or what do objects move? None.

Another thing to note: There are two types of acceleration: that which acts through the action of a force acting against the inertial force of the body being accelerated, and another which accelerates us without the resistance of our mass inertia as we fall – gravitational acceleration. This is something completely different from the first-mentioned Newtonian acceleration. In modern theory, this distinction is not made, since the force of attraction, although considered nonsense by Newton himself, is considered equivalent to the Newtonian force. However, the fact that this is nonsense has not remained entirely hidden, which is why modern scientists also say that the force of attraction is a "non-Newtonian" force. Does such a thing exist? Of course not; it is a pure invention to conceal ignorance.
Time dilations only occur after Newtonian accelerations,
i.e. NOT after gravitational accelerations!

With proper thinking, however, one can find the zero point for motion using time dilation: if a body has a time dilation, which can be measured, it also has the corresponding velocity of motion. Therefore, one must use clocks on light-emitting matter to find the body in which time passes most quickly. With luck, one will find the absolute zero point for motion this way. As far as I know, it is the body still falling that falls vertically to Earth at exactly escape velocity, because it only has this gravitational velocity when it comes from infinity from a state of rest, i.e., without ever having experienced a Newtonian acceleration. This body, since it has no Newtonian motion, is therefore "riding" on the absolute zero point of the world, since it has no time dilation, i.e., no Newtonian motion. Whoever or what is the zero point of the world follows.

4 What is time dilation?
The basic clock of the world is an atom at rest, around which an electron orbits, with its orbital period, provides the measure for the smallest unit of time. If this atom moves, the electron within it must also follow. Since it is not driven by the nucleus, it must move independently alongside the nucleus. How bodies move (the zero problem) is not yet important at this point; only, both the nucleus and the electron must move relative to the same reference zero. The electron remains attached to the nucleus by an electromagnetic bond. Despite this bond, however, it must make its own way in its orbits. The speed of the electron, since it exists as a wave, is the speed of light. Therefore, it can never speed up. This defines the fastest possible passage of time.

When the atom moves, the electron orbiting the nucleus has to travel a longer distance, either following a helical orbit when orbiting sideways or in the same plane overtake the nucleus and then falling back again. Since the electron is already moving at its maximum speed, the speed of light, the number of its rotations decreases when moving along with the nucleus, as shown in the figure.


Since the atom is the primordial clock, it slows down when the atom moves, and this is time dilation!
Time dilation is a normal mechanical process in nature.

All chemical processes, and even atomic ones such as nuclear decay, slow down due to time dilation, as do our thinking and our clocks, from atomic clocks to cuckoo clocks. Even on a large scale, at the speed of light, an airplane's propeller, for example, could no longer rotate sideways to the forward motion of the aircraft.
The electron, with its revolutions, is the "drive pinion" of all mechanical events in this world. Why? The large world is defined as the one whose smallest thing is the atom, and large is the sum of small, which is a criminally ignored physical law (formulas are never physical laws!).
The smallest mechanical progress in a sequence of events in this world is one revolution of an electron around its atomic nucleus. When much atoms do the same thing, even the largest machines move. If the revolutions of the electrons slow down, large machines also slow down, fire burns more slowly, we see and think more slowly, but we don't notice it at all, because:
Every identical action that occurs in nature, no matter how much slower time passes due to time dilation,
always consists in sum of exactly the same number of revolutions of the electrons in the atoms.

At the speed of light, the electrons can no longer move around their nucleus; they need their full speed just to keep up with the nucleus; any slightest sideways movement would cause them to fall back. All the atoms inside are dead; nothing moves anymore: Time stands still in such a body, even though it continues to travel in space. If the body were a spaceship, no one inside it could lift a finger to activate the braking engines, which wouldn't even be able to start up.

If we have time dilation, we see processes in other events that don't have time dilation unfold more quickly. If we were racing through space at almost the speed of light, we would see stars forming and burning up in enormous time lapse. But only if we could still see anything at all due to the Doppler effect, because forward, everything visible shifts into the ultraviolet up to gamma-ray frequencies, and backward into the ultra-infrared. 9) At the speed of light of the spaceship, no light beam from behind could catch up with the spaceship; it would be pitch black behind it. Stars could only be seen as a broad band of "rainbow colors" at an angle of 45° ahead.
The view from one time cycle to another is called relativistic, in reference to "relative" for views from within movements. Relativistic is not a thing, but, like relative, merely an attribute for perspectives.

Time dilation is an absolute quantity that refers to "zero time" as the fastest possible time that passes in a body that does not have Newtonian speed, i.e., that is at rest with respect to absolute zero.
Time dilation is a physical/mechanical quantity of Newtonian physics, such as temperature.

Time dilation differences between objects moving at different speeds do not result from the speed differences of the objects, but only as the difference in their absolute time dilation values.


5 The relativistic factor gamma
It is designed to calculate the passage of time in a natural event subject to time dilation. It was created by Hendrik Antoon Lorentz and is purely mathematical in structure. As such, it contains no visible reference to the materiality of its existence. This Lorentzian relativistic factor γ (gamma) is: 1 divided by the square root of [1 minus (v divided by c) squared] and can only be believed. But everything in nature is material; ghosts do not exist. It is therefore imperative that there must be a material connection to the nature of time dilation. This formula does not have one. One can always and everywhere apply mathematical formulations to natural phenomena, but these are only the symptoms of nature. Mathematics can never use them to fathom the causal, material processes of nature; only physics can do that, using forensic methods.

The following figure shows a graphical representation of the physical relativistic factor γph, which is derived from physical nature (in contrast to Lorentz's purely mathematical one). It arises from the concrete physical process and from which the value of the physical relativistic factor can even be directly derived trigonometrically. The electron velocity forms a unit circle, so that the relativistic factor can be measured on the abscissa as less than 1.


Lorentz's relativistic factor is often explained and derived in schools using the thought experiment of a light clock, which functions with a photon as a pendulum between two mirrors. Although this thought light clock could not function in motion, and is therefore incorrect, it nevertheless results in Lorentz's working formula. When physics is made with mathematics, the sources of errors are endless, sometimes for the better, but mostly for the worse. One rarely notices it.
Although the relativistic angle αr (see first image) is not visible in the Lorentz factor, it is nevertheless included because the value of cos αr is expressed in it using Pythagoras' equation. Lorentz was not yet aware that this triangle consisting of the speed of light of the electron, its orbital velocity, and the object's velocity even existed. The angle of the triangle is the angle at which the electron's helical trajectory advances as it orbits the atomic nucleus sideways—the so-called slope, as can be seen in the first image.
Due to its purely mathematical origin without knowledge of the physical origin of time dilation, the Lorentzian relativistic factor γ is the inverse of the physical relativistic factor γph. Thus, the relativistic time t' results either from normal time t times γph, or from normal time t times (1 divided by γ).
6 What are inertial systems?
What is still necessary to understand the whole is how physicists divide nature into groups that are distinct from others in some way. Related areas in nature that have no force connections to others and whose parts all move at the same constant speed according to the law of inertia are called inertial systems (Latin inertia means inertia, i.e., a constant further motion due to the mass inertia of all parts). The Earth's surface, including us, is one, albeit with the
incomprehensible problem that there is a uniform acceleration, the acceleration due to gravity, which an inertial system should not actually have according to the aforementioned definition. A spaceship is a classical inertial system, as are airplanes and cars, and even individual particles such as muons can be considered as such.
Time dilation provides a new way of defining inertial systems. Time dilation is a measure of the speeds that determine the difference between inertial systems. Because it is also an absolute quantity, it is a better measure for defining what an inertial system is. With it, the Earth's surface undoubtedly becomes an inertial system, since the gravitational time dilation (which follows in general relativity) also arises from a constant speed. Measuring differences in time dilation at the speeds occurring on Earth is only possible with long measurement times of at least hours, more likely days. Time dilation is an important criterion for fully understanding inertial systems.

If an inertial system has a significantly different speed than the observer looking into it, e.g. when looking from Earth into a spaceship traveling at close to the speed of light, it becomes apparent that everything there happens much slower than here. Despite what feels like a violent, a rapid hammer blow on a nut there, from here we would see the hammer hitting the hard nut in very slow motion, agonizingly slowly, and the nut still breaking. But that's really how it happens there, so it doesn't just look that way from here!  When looking relativistically into this very fast spaceship, any speed component towards us or away from us must of course be corrected using the resulting Doppler effect.

In moving inertial systems, such as a spaceship, time passes more slowly, depending on its speed. Newtonian physics still functions without any change even with the slower-moving time in the spaceship. In a spaceship with its own time, we would not notice at all that we are functioning more slowly. Seen from here, however, we would see the astronauts age more slowly. As these astronauts, however, we would die there after just as many heartbeats as if we had stayed here. If we were to look out of the spaceship, we would see that other processes are happening much faster, for example the Earth would be rotating faster, which of course it is not actually doing and only occurs because our clock and our vision are running slower in the spaceship. But we, as these astronauts, would also die there after just as many heartbeats as if we had stayed here. If we were to look out of the spaceship, we would see that other processes are happening much faster. For example, the Earth would be rotating faster, which of course it is not actually rotating and only occurs because our clock and our vision run more slowly in the spaceship.
The term relativistic is not yet explicitly defined, so here is an overview of views:
The absolute view into inertial systems of nature is that from absolute zero.
The relative view into inertial systems of nature is that from within one's own motion.
The relativistic view is the view from out of time dilation, into time dilation, or both simultaneously.

And be careful: it's not something seen that is relativistic, but only the view into it (after all, "relativistic stars" have already been invented). The only thing that could be described as relativistic is time.
relativistic is a view ; what is seen is exclusively pure Newtonian physics, running more slowly in inertial frames depending on their time dilations, and nothing else. Every inertial frame or every individual body therefore has its own time course, corresponding to its Newtonian velocity with respect to absolute zero.
Wo gibt es Zeitdilatation?
Time dilation only exists within massive objects or inertial systems that move relative to the origin of the universe.
The orbits of electrons within atoms define the relativistic time processes, which subsequently lead to even major mechanical, nuclear, chemical, optical, and biological processes occurring more slowly.
This means that, since the orbits of electrons around atomic nuclei can be viewed as the driving force of the mechanics of Newtonian physics, Newtonian physics is fundamentally relativistic and thus comprehensively subject to the time dilations of inertial systems.
This, in turn, means that all identical events in Newtonian mechanics always consist of exactly the same number of revolutions of the electrons around their atomic nuclei, no matter how extremely slow these events may be in inertial systems due to time dilation.
A proof of the relativistic nature of Newtonian physics is that the actual measurable and effective momentum of each particle is that which results from the calculation using the relativistic times running in the particle.
The orbits of electrons within atoms define the processes in the universe,
 which, as Newton rightly said, possesses only a fixed time.
Without motion relative to the "filling" of the seemingly empty universe,
following the yet-to-be-discovered absolute zero,
there is no Newtonian physics, but only purely gravitational processes.

A preview from the following paragraph, "A New Thinking with New Meaning": The zero point of the world is not the vacuum of space, but its opposite, namely its filling with a special substance, the so-called ether. Einstein, however, removed this substance from the world when it could not be detected with the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1881, because it was measured in the wrong direction, namely horizontally instead of vertically. This ether as the still unknown substance, that fills all of space down to the atoms, from which, according to Joseph Larmor, all material in the world originated, has been forgotten to this day, with the result that according to him a "dark matter" had to be invented (which, however, has never been proven) and is supposed to explain the processes that the ether actually causes. Incidentally, everything can be explained with additional inventions; in early times, gods were invented for this purpose, for example, to explain thunder. From this point on, the term ether will be used in its meaning in Newtonian physics as the absolute zero point of motion. Why this is the case will be explained later.
The ether as the zero point of nature for Newtonian physics, flows through masses and their atoms, within which electrons move, thus creating time dilation. This is already the first proof that, contrary to Einstein's belief, the ether does exist. On the Earth's surface, the ether flows from top to bottom, also through us, so that with our clocks we experience gravitational time dilation, which has long been known, but until now we didn't know how or why it arises.

7 Where is there no time dilation?
Our time is defined by the length of the day due to the rotation of the Earth relative to the Sun.
This passage of time is not subject to time dilation and is consistent throughout the universe.

Our time is defined by the length of the day due to the rotation of the Earth relative to the Sun. This passage of time is not subject to time dilation and is consistent throughout the universe.Our time is defined by the length of the day due to the rotation of the Earth relative to the Sun.This passage of time is not subject to time dilation and is consistent throughout the universe.Our time is defined by the length of the day due to the rotation of the Earth relative to the Sun.This passage of time is not subject to time dilation and is consistent throughout the universe.

A body falling vertically from infinity to Earth falls only in and with the ether and thus impacts the Earth at 11 km/s. During its fall, it has no speed relative to the ether as absolut zero point of the universe, and thus no time dilation; it has a Newtonian speed of zero.
The "sucking" of the ether by the Earth's mass vertically into it from top to bottom is gravity. Gravitational time dilation on Earth is therefore the effect of the vertical flow of ether through all masses.

Small bodies moving in free space relative to the ether and lacking sufficiently strong gravitational effects receive that time dilations corresponding to their speeds against the ether. These are the speeds at which the ether flows through them as a wind. Satellites and spacecraft experience time dilations corresponding to their speeds relative to the ether. Movements of the  ether with this bodies against the coordinates of space do not produce time dilations.

 Our passage of time results from the Earth's rotation. To make this more precise, it was converted to a specific microwave frequency. However, this is subject to gravitational time dilation and the time dilation resulting from the Earth's circumferential speed. Both are location-dependent. These can, and therefore must, correct the clocks according to their values. Only then do these commonly called atomic clocks achieve a desired absolute passage of time.

This time passage is called "base time" or "zero time" and applies to the entire universe, as Newton correctly envisioned: a common time for everything. Individual bodies, or the so-called inertial systems, also have without motions against the ether the zero time .

All gravitational motions" are the sole content of general relativity. However, it is only a theory of gravity, from which people have long attempted unsuccessfully to create a theory of the world. Einstein described (not explained!) the gravitationally caused trajectories of stars in the sky, but only mathematically and in an unsuitable coordinate system, namely that of a force-free body, which exhibits not only gravitational but also Newtonian motion. Einstein's force-free body would only be the zero point of the world if it had no Newtonian motion, i.e. if it fell vertically onto celestial bodies at exactly escape velocity. The ether flowing into the Earth is the zero point (or better, zero point field) of the world. All fantasies regarding dark matter and energy are no longer needed, because everything can be explained directly with the ether; it is the zero point of the world, even though it moves and thereby triggers gravity.
 Newtonian velocities refer to the time progression within a moving object, which is caused by the time dilation of the ether flowing through it. Time dilation increases the effective velocities according to Newtonian physics, but not the geometric velocities measured externally from rest, which end at the speed of light relative to the ether. When an object's speed is equal to the speed of light relative to the ether, the time progression within the object becomes zero; no more time passes within it, thus the Newtonian velocity and thus the object's effective momentum become infinitely large. The higher velocities caused by time dilation are called "relativistic," although they are the true Newtonian velocities. This is an inaccuracy, like the one that once attributed a plus-to-minus motion to electrons, even though it occurs the other way around.

8 Einstein's mistake
According to Einstein, the speed of light is not only absolutely constant, but also relative. Relative means that light always hits objects at an absolutely constant speed, no matter how fast they are moving towards or away from it. Oncoming light photons would therefore only hit each other at one time the speed of light instead of twice that. Of course, that's not possible in three-dimensional space. But because Einstein said it, people believe it and teach it that way in schools. That would make a Doppler effect in light absolutely impossible; it shouldn't even be allowed to occur. But it does occur!? Radar devices use it in car traffic, and astronomers use it too; it shows interesting movements of stars, after all.
What did they do with this problem? They simply renamed the Doppler effect in light, which Einstein claimed shouldn't exist at all but is actually present and calculated precisely according to Newton's laws, as a "relativistic" Doppler effect. Why do they do this when the Doppler effect in light is calculated precisely according to Newton's formulas, and theoretical physics has adopted the paradigm that correct calculations are proof of correct views of nature, especially since no formulas for the actual Doppler effect can be found using relativistic considerations? The answer: What cannot be that mast not be: Einstein is always right. Such behavior is pseudophysics.

The fact that the Doppler effect occurs in light according
exactly to Newton's formula is proof that Einstein's assumption
of a simultaneous absolute and relative constant speed of light is false. 

It's also false that oncoming light travels at only one speed of light, not twice the speed. Two light rays naturally approach each other at twice the speed of light. If one were to observe light photons traveling between Earth and the Moon and versa one would certainly see them traveling at twice the speed of light—what else?
If two spaceships were to collide, each traveling with the speed of light from the outside, the speeds measured within them and by their clocks would be infinite. They travel distance, but no time passes within them. Thus, the difference in speed between the two would be twice infinite. However, infinity cannot be increased any further, so that the relativistic, i.e., Newtonian, difference in speed is only infinite once. The maxim that 1 plus 1 equals 1 in space is false. However, 1 plus 1 equals 1 holds in Newtonian physics in inertial frames, because:
The maximum Newtonian speed is infinite!

Whenever speeds are discussed in physics, it is always necessary to clarify the timescale of the clocks used for measurements. Absolute speeds are those measured with a clock without time dilation. This clock must still be set up on Earth, also to fix the speed of light absolutely, taking into account the time dilation caused by the circumferential speed of the Earth's surface with the clock located on it, in addition to the gravitational time dilation.
A further distinction must be made between how fast an object moves in space relative to its coordinates and how fast it moves in relation to the ether and within the objects with the proper times applicable there. Proper times are those that prevail in moving inertial systems due to their time dilations and with which Newtonian physics operates within them.

9 The nonsense of special relativity
The special theory of relativity deals with natural processes influenced by time dilation. Its mathematics essentially consists only of the formula for the relativistic factor, without being able to specify where and how this factor is to be used in the observation of natural phenomena. In particular, when it was applied to momentum, a commonplace concept in physics—that is, the energy out of the force with which a moving mass can produce effects—it went completely wrong, as follows.
If a mass experiences time dilation due to its speed, which is unavoidable, the momentum of that mass becomes measurably larger, reaching infinity at the speed of light. This increased momentum of the moving mass due to time dilation is called "relativistic" momentum after Einstein, although it is precisely the Newtonian momentum, which results from the mass multiplied by its Newtonian speed, which, after all, extends to infinity and leads to the correct value of the actual destructive effect of the impacting mass. Thus, there is no such thing as "relativistic" momentum at all, but only Newtonian momentum, which is the momentum altered by time dilation.
 The actual energy with which a moving body causes effects (e.g. destruction)
is calculated using Newtonian physics, namely from its mass times its Newtonian speed
 (which is the speed calculated using the time course of the clock of the moving body).

The formula for momentum is "mass times velocity," which breaks down into mass times distance divided by time. For "relativistic" momentum, this is mass times distance divided by (time times the physical relativistic factor). Since time slows down due to time dilation and is below the fraction bar, the momentum (the force) actually increases.
Now the first error occurred:
Since mathematicians believe that the relativistic factor can be considered as belonging to momentum, this factor can, if desired, also be shifted to mass and distance according to mathematical rules (not physical ones!) (factors can be combined arbitrarily). Mathematicians believe that they can explore the world with this paradigm of "squeezing physical interpretations out of formulas," but they are mistaken! Since, according to this "squeezing method," the factor can also be mathematically assigned to mass or length accordingly, and the result remains the same, it has been interpreted that there is also an increase in mass and a contraction in length. But neither of these exists. Unfortunately, nature does not follow mathematical rules, although they are 99% accurate, but not 100% accurate. Nature has its own rules, but these are criminally neglected and not even sought out, because they could disrupt the "work" of mathematicians.
The second error is even more serious:
It is assumed that time, mass, and length also change relativistically at the same time, meaning that in an inertial system subject to time dilation, time slows down, mass increases, and paths shorten. What mathematical rule allows this? The relativistic factor is only included once in the momentum formula? None! This approach, however, clearly demonstrates one thing: a fundamental lack of understanding of what time dilation is. So, from a purely mathematical perspective, either time slows down, mass increases, or path length shortens, and the other two remain the same.
In mathematics you can "juggle", but not in physics, i.e. in nature!

The third mistake is:
Can the relativistic factor even be removed from time, since it is arising out of the? No, it can't! Time dilation is a mechanical process; how could it be removed? The relativistic factor isn't just a multiplicative addition to time, but rather simply indicates the slower mechanical progression of time. What does that have to do with mass and length? Only time is relativistic; therefore, there is no such thing as relativistic mass or relativistic length.
Nature is perfectly explained by Newtonian physics.
Only time in it depends on the speed of the inertial systems.

And a fourth mistake:
Has nature ever been asked whether it can realize mass increase and length contraction? It doesn't, and it can't. Physics isn't about finding correct quantitative results; that can always be achieved without, and even with, incorrect physical theories by discovering correlations between the interactions of the things involved. Physics is about finding the connections (cause-effect-principles) of all things in the world, where time is also material. The science of physics is about exploring the "why," not the "how."

5) The special theory of relativity, which arose solely from the existence of time dilation, is nothing! If it were to make any sense at all, its purpose would be to explain time dilation at its origin. However, it only uses time dilation, and that very incorrectly.
Physics is about explaining the world, not calculating it!
Mathematics is result-structured; the paths to results are open.
Nature is path-structured; for every phenomenon, there is always only
a single stringent principle-based path from cause to effect..

The assessment of special relativity in www.sciencemag.org/content/177/4044/168.abstract/ for the Hafele-Keating experiment,
whose results clearly refute the special relativity, is a knowingly, deliberately concocted lie, deliberately peppered with unfamiliar technical terms intended to create the illusion of considerable expertise. If the measurement results had been known in advance, Hafele and Keating would never have been allowed to conduct these measurements. Therefore, it's even astonishing that they were made public at all. Normally, such inconsistencies between theories and reality end up in the locked scientific "poison cabinet."


10 The general theory of relativity, or GTR for short
This, too, is nonsense; while mathematically conceivable, it is devoid of any reality. Nothing in it has been materially proven so far, except that "the results are correct." However, mathematically correct results also arise from physically incorrect theories, e.g., in the case of gravity, with the theory of attraction, field theory, minimum path theory, and even with the ancient epicycle theory, which could also predict solar eclipses. GTR is solely a theory of gravity, which is why it cannot be reconciled with quantum mechanics. Like the other aforementioned theories of gravity, it can only describe the externals, the symptoms of what the true material origin of gravity produces. And general theory of gravity does this from a ridiculous point of reference, namely, from the mathematically straightened fall curve of a force-free body, whereby the curvature of the fall line migrates toward the surroundings, just as the rotation of a carousel, from the perspective of the carousel, becomes the rotation of the surroundings. This exchange of coordinates then gave rise to the oversized, incomprehensible, and nonsensical concepts such as spacetime and the curvature of space. Neither of these definitely exists.

Wapping motions, i.e., coordinate systems, is the biggest mistake that can be made in physics, because it also swaps cause and effect: the natural coordinate system, determined by nature itself, must always be found. And that is ultimately absolute zero, i.e., the ether.

To decipher the cause of gravity, according to the rules of physics (which no one wants to know about), one must first find its natural coordinate system. And this is nothing other than the zero point of the universe. Only with it can truths be revealed.

Einstein assumed that a force-free, i.e., falling, body would move in a straight line and at a constant speed according to Newton's law of inertia. Which, in fact, it does. Since, as seen from our perspective, this isn't the case on the Earth's surface, Einstein allowed the entire universe to be "bent" around the body by means of superdimensions in space and time so that its trajectory would theoretically be straight: the tail wags the dog. Einstein took the tail as the origin. And this is precisely what is highly credited as a stroke of genius. Where does the intellect and reason go? In this superdimensional "physics," thought, and with it reason, are eliminated; only mathematics still has the say, but it can't possibly know what it is calculating.

11 A new way of thinking with natural senses.

Einstein's initial reasoning is correct: according to Newton's law of inertia, a body free from forces must move straight ahead and at constant speed; it is in a state similar to that of free space. Relative to whom or what will this body move? Relative to the absolute fixed point of the world, of course. And that is precisely what it does, because it is neither influenced from outside nor does it have its own drive to cause any changes in motion. Thus, it can only move passively relative to the absolute fixed point of the world. Thus, only the fixed point of the world itself can influence it.
The consequence: this fixed point would have to be designed in such a way that it reflects the pattern we observe on the Earth's surface, namely the motion of the force-free body on a parabolic trajectory with increasing downward velocity.

If a force-free body moves according to Newton's law of inertia and relative to the absolute reference point, but the trajectory is not straight and constant in velocity, but rather a parabolic trajectory, then there is only one solution: the absolute zero point itself makes the movements that deviate from the movements expected according to Newton's law of inertia. And for this to happen, the absolute zero point, which is still only hypothetical, only requires an accelerating downward fall. And with this, it simply carries the Newtonian straight inertial trajectory along with the local gravitational increase in velocity. And that is precisely the case, and it is also the secret of gravity.

 What would the zero point of the world, the ether, have to consist of? Something, but something material, because nature fundamentally consists only of material things, since nothing can have no effect on concrete things. "Fields," such as a gravitational field, don't exist either; they are purely mathematical inventions and serve only as placeholders for things yet to be discovered. Furthermore, this material nature of the zero point of the world must be invisible, otherwise we would recognize it. But if this fixed point of the world flows downward, even into the Earth, it would also have to be available as a thing indefinitely, never being used up.
 
Einstein's force-free body does not move straight ahead in a hypothetically overly curved space, but rather straight ahead in the three-dimensional space relative to the zero point of motion in the form of the ether, which, however, moves itself as the source of gravity, thus leading to ballistic motion curves. The Gauls, with Asterix and Obelix, are right to fear that the sky might fall on their heads: but it does so from the very beginning, as ether, which we cannot feel, but which can be struck by bodies within it.

It's important to note that it's not the bodies falling with the ether that hit us, but rather, since the ether is the zero point of the universe, we bounce from our floor against the falling bodies from bottom to top. The zero point is the boss, not us! Geometrically, falling bodies appear to fall on us, but functionally, the floor moves upward with us; unfortunately, we have to accept that.
Since the ether falls from the outside onto the "sphere" of Earth, it is a flow that constantly accelerates, as if flowing into a hole. The result is that, functionally, the Earth's surface accelerates upward, which is easily measured with an accelerometer. This geometrically invisible acceleration is the cause of our weight. Are we being accelerated upward from the Earth's surface? Yes! Relative to the zero point, which accelerates downward into the Earth, the Earth's surface accelerates upward, so that we accelerate upward with it, thus becoming "heavy," as Einstein illustrated with his example of a person in a constantly accelerating elevator in space, but ignored the consequences.
The result:

There is no attractive force as the cause of gravity!

Newton himself said so. It doesn't fit at all with the other forces of nature, the strong and weak interactions, and the electromagnetic force. Our weight, which Einstein was the only one to correctly recognize, arises from an acceleration from bottom to top(!), measurable by anyone.

If we could see the ether falling from above downwards as the zero point for all motions it would immediately become clear that we with the Earth's surface relative to it are accelerating upwards. We would also recognize that light rays from other stars arriving from above hit the Earth's surface at the speed of light relative to the ether plus the ether's falling velocity. Ascending light, on the other hand, starts off upwards at the speed of light minus the Earth's escape velocity. Light from outside hits the surface of the cores of black holes at its speed relative to the ether plus the ether falling at superluminal speed from the event horizon and can therefore never rise again.

The second consequence is that the problem of defining movements  is solved: relative to absolute zero, the ether. However, since the absolute zero point, the ether, itself is moving, there is naturally also the case that, despite our stationary position relative to the Earth's surface, we have a movement relative to absolute zero, since it is moving, namely accelerating downwards, with a velocity at the Earth's surface equal to the Earth's escape velocity.

This ether is precisely the one that Plato already considered the origin of everything and the one that Einstein, contrary to all serious research rules, banished from physics based on a single experiment (Michelson-Morley) without confirmation by another with a different measurement theory. It's a good thing that Maxwell discovered his electromagnetic formulas beforehand, because without the ether, they wouldn't exist today. Maxwell thus provided the first proof that the ether exists. Two further proofs are included on this homepage.
The ether is thus the reference point for everything that happens in this universe. The fixed point of the world is therefore not a point, but a reference environment, like water for fishes. Following Paul Dirac, thinking physicists have already named an "ether lake" as "Dirac lake."

This ether is in fact the universe. It fills it up down into the atoms, which is why the electrons in atoms must move independently relative to it as an absolute reference point, thus creating the time dilation. And the ether is the medium that gives light its wave structure, namely through its ability to oscillate, which also determines its speed relative to it.
Robert B. Laughlin (Nobel Prize 1998) writes about light in his book "Farewell to the World Formula": The quantum properties of sound coincide with those of light. Thus, light, like sound, is the movement of an oscillating medium, namely the ether, which Einstein removed from the world, which was truly his greatest mistake.
The ether is the absolute zero point of the world, and this world is, quite normally, three-dimensional.
And: There are no insubstantial "fields"; everything in nature is material.

Even the invisible in this world is material. The fact that we have a time dilation on the Earth's surface arises naturally also from the fact that we have a velocity relative to the ether falling into the Earth. Our time dilation from this arises only in reverse: the ether flows through us. The velocity of this flow is precisely the escape velocity from the Earth. Only with this minimum velocity can we leave the Earth against the vertical ether flow. Can this ether flow be measured? Yes, with the measurement theory used by Michelson-Morley, but in the vertical direction.

The Michelson-Morley experiment was intended to measure a gas-like ether that would be created horizontally by the Earth's motion in its orbit around the Sun. However, this failed because this horizontal ether wind doesn't exist: The ether flows vertically into the Earth's surface. However, a certain "entrainment" from the rotation of the Earth's mass results in a slight deviation (lateral entrainment) from the vertical, which leads to the Lense-Tirring effect.
In addition to the very small lateral component of the falling ether motion caused by the Lense-Tirring effect, an apparent horizontal ether movement relative to the earth's surface caused by the circumferential velocity of the Earth's surface. However, in the Michelson-Morley experiment, this appears only with a value of 0.46 km/second at the equator. This was ignored, however, because it seemed far too insignificant compared to the much higher value expected from the Earth's orbital velocity around the Sun of 30 km/second.

The result of the Hafele-Keating experiment, which measured time dilation in airplanes flying around the world in east and west directions, should have been accurately predicted by the special theory of relativity, because that's exactly what it was designed for, and it can't do anything else. But it can't, not even remotely, not even retrospectively. Its formulas produce a constant value for both directions of orbit around the Earth, compared to the measured values, ranging from half to even negative one and a half times in the opposite direction! It's the same disaster as the Michelson-Morley experiment. Nevertheless, this experiment is being used, even through lies, as support for the special theory of relativity, because what cannot be, cannot be. But: either a theory can predict something exactly, or it is completely wrong! There is nothing in between that must be accepted as a hard rule of physics.

Why does the ether flow through us into the Earth? In contrast to the search for dark matter, which doesn't even exist because it only had to be invented because Einstein removed the ether, the now renewed search for the ether is finally something concretely measurable, even if only indirectly as time dilation. The question of why the ether flows into matter and where it then ends up (as what?) must, of course, be answered separately. However, there have long been assumptions that the Earth could have grown, meaning that it was smaller in the past.

Further future tasks include:
What does the ether consist of? The apparent vacuum in space is currently attributed an energy content: However, its substance remains to be investigated.
What is inertia? This is by no means a kind of friction between matter and ether, since the ether passes through matter, and vice versa, and yet Newton's law of conservation of velocity still holds: a body free of force maintains its velocity relative to and within the ether for all eternity. Mass inertia must therefore be something entirely unique, possibly within matter in the interaction of the atomic building blocks with the ether, which permeates matter.
And, by what "mechanics" does time pass in μ-mesons, since these are radioactive?
And what is Newtonian force? It's not just a dynamic acceleration force against inertia, but also a static force in the form of tensile, compressive, clamping, and screwing forces!
Einstein described the world from the relative perspective out of a force free body on its gravitational downward curve how the stars that approach it, moved on curved lines (space curvature), but which merely reflects the gravitational curvature of the body itself, just as we perceive our circular motion on a merry-go-round as a circular motion of its surroundings. Einstein thus assumed that the curved trajectory of the force free body is straight and moves at a constant speed.

Such relative views have confused humanity from the very beginning and will continue to do so forever: first with the belief that the sun revolves around us, and with Einstein, the world curves around his force-free body in such a way that its trajectorie becomes straight. The term "relative" was born precisely to describe views that, in contrast to the true, denote the false! Thus, a "theory of relativity" can per se cannot discover any truths.

12 Gravitation
Graviation is the flow of the ether, along with everything within it, into matter such as celestial bodies.
Matter eats ether!

The result, therefore, is that the ground, which has an upward velocity relative to the ether as the zero point of the universe, accelerates us upward, which is, of course, initially unimaginable. But nature isn't required to provide us with only imaginable information. We have to believe it, because this upward acceleration is precisely measurable and demonstrated on YouTube.com in "Mysterium Beschleunigung." If we fall, this upward acceleration disappears; we are weightless, thus free of forces, and are carried downward with the ether as the zero point, along with its increasing velocity. Measuring instruments never lie, but people, even scientists, do. The zero point of the universe, i.e., the ether, has the final say, not human logic.

Humans must submit to the reality of nature and not always insist on their own view of things. However schizophrenic it may seem that the Earth's surface accelerates upward toward falling bodies, which may not be geometrically but functionally, it doesn't change the fact that the ether is the fixed point of the universe; it is the boss, everything relates to it! Believing this is repugnant to everyone, but it must determine our thinking, otherwise we will never understand the world. Compared to what Einstein demanded, namely the need to understand super-dimensions, which is simply not possible, this is actually quite understandable; it simply requires adapting human logic to that of nature.
Newtonian physics with its time dilation in the ether is the "world formula"

The ether is not only the foundation of the universe, but it itself is the universe and fills it up completely. According to Joseph Larmor, matter first emerged from it, thus it is a component of itself, and the small world, the quantum world, is likely also determined by it. It is directly involved in Maxwell's electromagnetic theory.

Gravitation can also be described as follows:
Matter "eats" ether, so that bodies move toward each other as they consume the ether in their interstices. If this is prevented, as in an experiment when two bodies are held close together, a force is created at the attachments of each body, which is misinterpreted as an attractive force between them.
This "space-eating" process is the basis for the development of mathematical formulas for the abstract descriptions of gravitational motion. According to Newton's law of inertia, every body moves in a straight line and at a constant speed within and relative to the ether, the real, material zero point of the universe. The moon, for example, is unaware that it orbits the Earth; it moves in a straight line relative to the ether, which, however, flows centrally toward the Earth.

13 Dark Matter
Since stars in the outer arms of the galaxy are assumed to move according to the law of centrifugation, which they do not, but rather orbit faster and should actually fly away, Einstein, after banishing the ether, which would have solved the problem, invented dark matter instead, which, through its own gravitational effect, ensures that these stars do not fly away. This centrifugal force theory is incorrect, however. The space between the stars is not empty, but filled with ether. This ether flows in a vortex toward the center of the galaxy. Stars within it move within it and simultaneously with it. How these two types of motion can be separated remains to be explored. The result, however, is:
There is no such thing as dark matter!! 

That is why they have not been found even after decades of searching and even high financial expenditure.

Dark Energy was discovered when a redshift, caused by the Doppler effect of stars moving away from us, was measured, increasing disproportionately with distance. This redshift is directly interpreted as an exponentially increasing speed of the stars. But is that true? Difficult to determine, but thinking helps.
If the speed of light had remained constant from the beginning, i.e., after the Big Bang, when space became transparent, until today, then energy would indeed be required to interpret the increasing redshifts directed away from us as increases in speed. But where could this energy come from? So, following the example of dark matter, dark energy was invented, but it too was never discovered.
Much more logical and even measurable is the theory that the speed of light in the ether continuously decreases due to its expansion after the Big Bang, initially faster, now imperceptibly slower. Assuming a slowing of the speed of light relative to the ether resulting from lower density, this inevitably leads to the light from the early days of the cosmos now having a lower frequency, i.e., a redshift. The earlier the light began, the lower the current frequency. And the slowing down of the speed of light will also be exponential, like the decrease in density of the universe after the Big Bang. As far as I know, there are already suspected measurements of a slowing down of the speed of light over time, but these are not available to me and may be kept under wraps (which conceal much more).
There is no such thing as dark energy either!!


 14 Black holes
Black holes weren't discovered by Einstein. It was always clear that stars could become so large that, once they reached a sufficiently large mass, their escape velocities would exceed those of light, meaning no light or other information could escape from them.
The so-called event horizon has been defined for the distance from the black hole, where its escape velocity has reached the speed of light. It is located at the distance around the core of a black hole where the inflow of ether exceeds the speed of light. Further toward the central star of the black hole, the flow velocity of the ether naturally increases further as a result of gravitational force, so that nothing can actually escape from the black hole. The speed of light exists relative to the ether, but there is no limit to how fast the ether itself can flow.
Der Ereignishorizont ist aber kein "Ding", dem man gar Speicherung von Daten zuordnen könnte, die sonst im schwarzen Loch verschwinden würden (was für eine Unsinn!), sondern nur die örtliche Stelle, wo der Ätherfluß zum schwarzen Loch Lichtgeschwindigkeit bezogen auf dessen Flußrichtung zum Zentralkörper besitzt (siehe auch in YouTube unter "Mysterium schwarzes Loch").
The ether doesn't flow vertically into a black hole, but rather spirals into the core due to the Lense-Thirring effect, which stems from the core's very high rotational speed. This is why a so-called accretion disk forms from falling masses. The fall line of a body is therefore a spiral. A plumb line on the surface of the black hole's core would point very obliquely to the ground. A singularity, i.e., a core with zero diameter, is mathematical fantasy, because it could never produce a Lense-Thirring effect, which is clearly visible.

Stephen Hawking postulated that at the event horizon, a static spherical surface, particles of matter and antimatter would form from the static, resting, energetic vacuum—in realkity the inflowing ether—so that one of the two could fly outward, causing the black hole to lose mass, evaporate, so to speak. However, no radiation has been found that would result from this, and it will never be found, because there is no resting ether at the event horizon; instead, it flows at the speed of light toward the core of the black hole, albeit at an angle due to the Lense-Thirring effect.

Because the Lense-Tirring effect, which results from the very rapid rotation of the central body, which must be materially present, causes the inflow of ether to occur in a disk-like pattern, the majority of the surrounding etheric space flows into the black hole in the plane of the so-called accretion disk. At the poles, the inflow of ether slows down progressively until it reaches the vertical, so that the event horizon there can even sink to the surface, and light escapes as a jet. In this way, something actually comes out of the black hole. It would be nice if a jet were pointing toward us, so that information could be extracted from this escaped light. A so-called "singularity," i.e., a core of a black hole with a diameter of zero millimeters, is pure fantasy of mathematicians with no grasp of the essence of nature.
With this correct world theory expressed in verbally stringent colloquial language, which is the true language of physics, both the large and the small, as well as the natural phenomena of time dilation and gravity, now fit together with Newtonian physics. And that is the supreme criterion for the correctness of physical theories.
Physics is the verbal explanation of nature from cause to effect using principles.

Mathematics proves several different, clearly false theories of gravity. What does this prove? That mathematics can't prove anything at all in physics. Physics itself has to establish proof criteria for physical theories in verbal form, which must finally be done. However, this isn't possible at the moment because contemporary physics contains too many dogmas, causing the entire "theoretical physics" edifice with strict, universally valid criteria to collapse like a house of cards. Otherwise, it would have happily been done long ago.
Afterword
How did the german Federal Constitutional Court define science? Scientists themselves couldn't:
Science is all activities that lead to the discovery of truth.
So this publication also addresses truths,
even though truth is a forbidden word in today's physics!

 


Two experiments, that directly confirm the existence of the ether

Experiment 1
The frequency of light flowing vertically upwards was measured. The measurement results show that the light frequency becomes smaller towards the top (ie the wavelength increases), and the light becomes redder. This result contradicts Einstein, who proposed that the speed of light is absolutely constant in every respect. It cannot be a Doppler effect, because the measuring devices are fixed, and only the light moves. Researchers are at a loss as to how this can be.


The solution to the riddle:

The above sketch illustrates how air flows into a hole. According to the laws of flow, the speed of the air accelerates quadratically by reducing the distance until it reaches the hole. A loudspeaker creates sound in the hole, moving against the accelerating airflow. If the sound frequency is measured in the air stream, it can be observed that it decreases with increasing distance to the hole.

How does this happen? This is the normal Doppler effect, just in an unusual situation. The frequency, which the loudspeaker generates in the oncoming air immediately in front of it, is higher than that with which it vibrates, according to the normal Doppler effect. As the distance from the hole increases, the waves of sound in the air lengthen, because the counterflow of the air becomes slower. The sound frequency decreases, and the vibration waves of the sound become longer. At a sufficient distance, the frequency with which the loudspeaker actually vibrates in the inflow hole is reached.

Similarly, if the siren of a stationary police car was switched on and a strong wind blew towards the car, the oncoming air would increase the siren frequency (akin to the car moving and not the air). If the wind decreased with increasing distance until it came to a standstill, the frequency of the siren sound would also decrease until the original frequency of the siren was reached at the location where the siren vibrates.

Astrophysicists do not even know how lucky they are to be able to measure the temperatures of stars correctly, even though the light frequency is higher at the point of origin and only falls to the value that corresponds to the temperature with a corresponding distance. However, the frequency increase when it hits the earth must be taken into account.

The result:

if the frequency of light decreases upwards, there must be an oncoming medium: the medium that is light vibrations.
Air is the vibrating medium for sound. Is it also the vibrating medium for light? That can only be the ether, which is precisely the component that Einstein banished from physics and was sought in the Michelson–Morley experiment. As Robert Laughlin (Nobel Prize 1998) stated about light, ‘The quantum properties of sound agree with those of light’. Thus, light is also the vibration of a medium.

How did the Michelson–Morley experiment yield incorrect results?
The applied measurement theory correctly presupposes that the ether is the oscillation medium for light. Thus, there should be a speed difference for light, which flows in the direction against the ether movement and in the direction to the side. Both are correct and cannot be wrong.

However, where is against and where to the side?

The light flow against the ether and laterally was expected horizontally on the earth's surface, because the earth moves on its orbit around the sun through the ether, which is considered to be at rest; hence, it flows along the earth's surface as a wind. However, the only result obtained was the one described above.

The experiment with rising light now shows that the medium, the oscillation of which is light, flows from top to bottom and not horizontally (as was assumed at the time). The tiny measured value obtained in the Michelson–Morley experiment, which is no longer discussed today, arises from the peripheral speed of the earth's surface, which also led to the astonishing results of the Hafele–Kaeting experiment. In the future, a researcher should find out what the ether is and why it flows into the earth.

With that, the first pillar of Einstein's theories fell. Light is the vibration of the ether, which actually exists. Light is constant, compared to the ether, but remains the measure of all speeds for all other movements of Newtonian physics.

Experiment 2
As an experiment in the context of gravitational research, atomic clocks were placed next to a heavy rotating flywheel and compared to a more distant clock (see figure below).


The result:
the clock next to the downward side of the flywheel moves more slowly, and the clock on the upward side moves faster than the comparison clock further away. Again, researchers are confused by this.

The light experiment shows that ether falls from top to bottom into the earth. It can, therefore, be assumed that it flows into matter in general, similar to the mass of the flywheel. As a result, as it flows down it penetrates the downward moving side of the flywheel. Thus, it has to follow the downward moving matter particles of the flywheel hence, its speed increases in the vicinity of the downward moving side of the flywheel. The opposite occurs on the ascending side, where the flow of ether from top to bottom is reduced. This outcome is known as the Lense–Thirring effect. They found it out of the general relativity, without being able to say what its material cause is.

The clocks near the flywheel move faster because of the ether movement on the downside and slower on the upside. Movement towards the ether are at those speeds from which time dilation arises, which is also still unknown.

The clock located at a farther distance is affected by the speed at which the ether falls to the earth. This speed is the escape speed from the earth, that is, the speed necessary to escape from the earth against the ether flow. The time dilation owing to the falling ether leads to the so-called gravitational time dilation. It is also a consequence of a speed in relation to the ether. The principle of causality (that there can only be one single cause for every natural phenomenon) is now finally fulfilled for time dilation.

The fact that rotating masses set the ether around them in rotation suggests that black holes (with their significant mass and high numbers of revolutions) must have nuclei with a concrete geometric diameter, in order to rotate the ether around them up to distances of light years. A singularity, ie a core with a radius of zero (and the associated fantasies, such as wormholes), is, therefore, poor fantasy.